O  A  R  M  H  P

Ohio Association of Responsible Mental Health Practices  

 

 

       

      


 
 
 
 

 

Controversial international ministry operates from Campbellsville

By Jan Fletcher, Faith Correspondent

A $2 million-plus Taylor County business that sells books and videos teaching a new form of Christian therapy in more than 100 countries is generating cries of miracle cures and of criticism to its controversial therapeutic approach.

Theophostic Ministries, founded by Ed Smith of Campbellsville, teaches that inside memories of past traumatic events are lies embedded by Satan that create emotional distress in a person's life.  A Theophostic facilitator encourages the person to go back to the memory, and then allows God to reveal the lie.  Proponents claim immediate relief from a variety of emotional problems.

A growing group of vocal critics, however, claims that efforts to deal with current abuse by resurrecting memories can lead to the creation of false memories during Theophostic sessions, which can sometimes result in false allegations.

One critic, Thomas Wright, of Yarmouth, Maine, saw Theophostic ministry tear his church apart when his former pastor, Wesley Harris, traveled to Campbellsville in 1998 to learn Theophostic techniques from Ed Smith.  Wright was arrested in April 2002 and charged with sexual abuse after a church member's memory surfaced, during Theophostic sessions, of Wright allegedly abusing a child.

In June 2002, Cumberland County, Maine, District Attorney Stephanie Anderson dismissed the sexual-abuse charges against Wright.  Evidence against Wright would be hard to prove in court because it was based on Harris' unconventional and biased therapeutic methods, said Anderson, adding that the American Psychological Society considers Harris' brand of therapy to be unreliable.

"Harris had previously done at least some counseling in the area of repressed memories of sexual abuse before going to the training in Campbellsville," said Wright.  "However, after the training he had a new and very dangerous belief, that it was actually God himself who was uncovering the memories."

Smith says critics are small in comparison to the vast number of Theophostic supporters.

"Go to a Web browser and search on Theophostic," said Smith.  "You'll see 500 sites and 495 of them are positive and only five are negative."

Although Smith developed Theophostic Ministries in Campbellsville in 1996, few Taylor County residents are familiar with the concept.  Smith refused to disclose the total income from sale of Theophostic materials, but said the operation sells 1,000 basic training packages a month.  Each package costs $165.

"You can do the math on that," said Smith.  "It's a substantial amount of money."

The operation also holds in-person training seminars at a cost of more than $800 per trainee.

Smith birthed the idea for Theophostic, which means "God light," while operating Family Care Christian Counseling in Campbellsville.

"My primary clientele were female survivors of sexual abuse.  I pretty well burned out locally on trying to help these ladies," said Smith, who has a doctorate in pastoral ministry.

Once Smith put together the ideas for Theophostic, he said he "suddenly got incredible results."

Smith said the local community has expressed little enthusiasm for his ideas.

"No interest, zero, nada," said Smith.  "It's kind of like a prophet in his hometown.  Five or six years ago, I quit trying."

Smith's church, New Covenant, is the only one in Campbellsville using Theophostic ministry materials, he said.

"Based on our database, 38,000 to date have bought materials in the U.S.," said Bill Renn, ministry operations director for Theophostic Ministries.

"It's actually like a runaway train.  We're currently in all 50 states.  Probably, in the next three to five years, we'll focus very heavily on the international market."

Hundreds come to Taylor County every year from around the world to be trained in advanced Theophostic counseling techniques at the Alathia Equipping Center, a conference center which sleeps 45, located on Raikes Hill Road in Mannsville, said Renn.

Kim Clough, of Sun Prairie, Wis., first heard of Theophostic when a friend gave her one of the 500 free introductory tapes distributed by Smith's operation each month.

"It seemed too good to be true," said Clough, who has suffered panic attacks for years.  She had no trouble finding a Theophostic minister in her area, since there were around 50, she said.

"It's real widespread."

Clough describes Theophostic sessions as private meetings where the facilitator prays and asks Jesus to take the person back to "another memory when you feel the same feeling," that is considered part of the current distress.

"You talk about it, get stirred up and go back to three or four memories.  The facilitator helps you discover the lie.  When Jesus brings the truth, the pain is gone.  It's like a miracle.  It's usually pretty intense.  There's horrible pain in these memories.  Some of the memories are some things I remember, some are things I haven't remembered before."

When she leaves for a session, said Clough, "sometimes I feel like I'm walking to the guillotine.  Then I walk out really a different person.”  She said a relative, now deceased, sexually abused her.

"Forgiving him is kind of a process.  It's hard to forgive something you don't know about," said Clough.

Martin Bobgan, of Santa Barbara, Calif., co-author with his wife Deidre, of "TheoPhostic Counseling: Divine Revelation?  Or PsychoHeresy?”  (1999), said he is most concerned about Smith's use of regression therapy.

 

 

 

The Lost Years
Long removed from the therapy that broke their families, anguished parents mourn the children who walked away.


BY REBECCA MEISER

It's the type of day you see only in Claritin ads.

The sky is an azure blue, the sun sits high on the clouds, and in their huge, golf-course-like backyard in Westlake, Dawn and Michael Patterson are hovering over their propane grill, barbecuing chicken breasts and waiting for the guests to arrive.

"Do you think we have enough?" Michael asks, pointing his spatula at the dozen or so sizzling slabs.

Dawn, a grandmotherly woman with a kind face, rolls her eyes, though she too is a bit of a worrier. Since laying out the food a mere 15 minutes earlier, she has twice checked to make sure the vegetable platters are out, that there is both sugar and sugar substitute (for the diabetic guest), that the ice is ready.

"I think we're OK," she says finally, settling on a patio chair and taking a minute to soak in the rays.

Michael, on his way from the backyard to the kitchen -- he wants more chicken, after all -- winks and squeezes his wife's elbow.

"You holding up?" he asks.

Dawn nods and smiles in response.

By around six, the guests start to arrive, clad in cotton shirts and linen pants, and carrying homemade desserts. They greet each other as close relatives do, exchanging warm hugs and pecks on the cheek.

Bob Jones, a muscular man in a collared shirt and khakis, makes his way over to Michael and engages him in a bear hug. Michael squeezes back.

"These people," Michael says, nodding at Bob and his wife Marilyn, "are the best friends we've never wanted." They chuckle heartily.

The guests make their way to the backyard picnic table. Dawn opens up an umbrella to block out the rays and hands out chilled glasses of lemonade and tea.

As the guests settle back in their chairs, cross their legs, and shift in closer, talk volleys from vacations to new homes to summer plans.

Then Marilyn sits back, squeezes lemon into her tea, and nonchalantly asks:

"So, Nate, I forget -- when was the first time you and your wife were accused of molestation?"


For more than a decade, each of them has come here, every few months, to seek relief among others who understand the pain. "You can try," says Dawn, "but you will never know what it's like to have your child accuse you of sexual abuse unless you've had it happen to you. Your friends will not understand, nor will your relatives." She pauses, then smiles wryly. "Lucky them."

In 1990, when the Pattersons first received a letter from their 25-year-old daughter accusing them of sexual abuse, they didn't understand where such allegations could come from. Dawn remembers collapsing into a weeping heap; Michael became indignant and angry. But their struggle, initially, was a silent one. Telling people that your child has accused you of molestation is not like revealing that your child has diabetes -- there are immediate and lingering implications.

A year earlier, as clinical therapy was reaching the height of its popularity in America, Laura Davis and Ellen Bass wrote a book titled The Courage to Heal. An immediate bestseller, it became a bible of sorts for recovered-memory therapy, a Freudian concept in which repressed memories from traumatic childhood experiences are believed to account for present-day problems.

Even if people think they "don't have memories," the book said, "there emerges a constellation of feelings, reactions and recollections that add up to substantial information. To say 'I was abused' you don't need the kind of recall that would stand up in court."

The Pattersons' daughter Megan, it turned out, had recovered childhood memories of her own.

After her first accusatory letter arrived in the mail, Megan essentially ended all contact with her family. Letters they sent to her were returned unopened. Megan refused phone calls from her brothers and sisters and childhood friends, who she felt were ganging up on her. Dawn, a teacher studying for her master's degree at the University of Akron, was so grief-stricken that she dropped out. What had caused the sudden change in Megan? The Pattersons suspected that she'd become involved with a cult.

It was on a plane, on her way to a conference about cults in 1992, that Dawn's pulse began to quicken. She had been lackadaisically paging through a mental-health magazine when a particular story caught her eye: a first-person account by a woman whose child had gone to a therapist specializing in recovered-memory therapy. Not long afterward, the child suddenly started "remembering" numerous instances of sexual abuse that she suffered when she was younger. Like the Pattersons, the author insisted that the accusations were false.

Weeping, Dawn woke her sleeping husband, tore out the pages, and contacted the author, Pamela Freyd, at the time a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania who had founded a national support network for parents dealing with recovered-memory accusations.

In the early 1990s, as recovered-memory techniques caught on, Freyd became the nation's go-to person for accused parents. Back in Ohio, Dawn and Michael started attending conferences and meeting other families torn apart by the therapy. Michael, an engineer by trade, and Dawn were hailed as the top counselors for Northeast Ohioans in crisis. Freyd starting referring some of her calls to the Westlake couple, who eventually started a Midwest branch of Freyd's organization.

Throughout the 1990s, the Pattersons received calls and e-mails from more than 700 families whose children accused them of abuse. Many parents were near-suicidal. The Pattersons' home became a sanctuary, and their roles as makeshift counselors evolved into part-time jobs. In Cleveland alone, more than 150 couples contacted them.

Meetings, which the Pattersons arranged a few times a month, were run AA-style. New members would stand up, legs trembling, and tell their stories. Their voices would crack, and they would start sobbing. Experienced members would try not to look too bored. "It got to be redundant," recalls Bob, who has been meeting the Pattersons with his wife for 12 years. "You just kept hearing the same story over and over again -- if you wanted to, you could recite the story for them." He pauses. "But there was comfort in that."

Yet, while the Pattersons were rocks of support for other families who needed them, they were still withering at the notion of their own fractured family and praying daily for Megan to come back.

"No one else understands us like these people," Dawn says, nodding to the group. "When my daughter got married without us there, the only one who really understood the pain was Nate's wife. She came over and held my hand while I cried."


These days, the dwindling group doesn't meet as often as it once did. Some of their wounds have healed, which is why they can now laugh and joke. But they each bear indelible scars from the damage wrought in the past decade, which is why they still seek one another's company.

Today is different, however: They are welcoming a new member, Carole, a 43-year-old Mentor woman whose story they hope will shed light on their own children's lives. Heavyset, with Jergens-soft hands and a sweet, heart-shaped face, Carole twitches a bit in her seat at the end of the picnic table. She's the last to arrive, the honorary guest at a party everyone wishes weren't necessary. Carole clears her throat and starts chattering nervously: about the weather, about a recent movie, about her husband -- she had asked him to accompany her, but then asked him to wait in their car out front. The others sit patiently. They've grown accustomed to leaping headlong into their own stories, like children unafraid of a cold swimming pool. For Carole, it's a more laborious process of toe-dipping and incremental submersions.

Eventually, she begins to speak in a thin voice, and then no one is able to cut her off. They lean their heads forward, as if in prayer.

In 1990, Carole was just learning about recovered memories. Acutely sensitive, with a masochistic streak, she had just broken up with a serious boyfriend. She contemplated suicide, but instead entered into weekly counseling.

One day, three months into her sessions, the therapist asked Carole to recount a few memories from her childhood -- times when she felt unprotected or scared or alone. Thinking hard, Carole remembered one experience where she had felt particularly vulnerable: Her father had been alone with her in the bathroom, giving her a bath and washing her entire body. She had felt extremely uncomfortable about the experience, the invasion of her privacy.

As Carole retold the story, her counselor said nothing -- but her upraised brow was enough to set Carole's mind reeling. When she left the session that day, the counselor recommended that Carole pick up a copy of The Courage to Heal.

Carole spent the next week paging through the book, and she found herself underlining passages like "If you think you were abused and your life shows the symptoms, then you were," and "If you are unable to remember any specific instances . . . but still have a feeling that something abusive happened to you, it probably did." Suddenly, she was recalling a whole new realm of abuses: her father fondling her in the living room, her mother sitting there, letting it happen.

The therapist recommended art therapy with other victims of sexual abuse. Twice a week, they were given brushes and watercolors, and told to fill a blank canvas with their emotions. Sometimes Carole would draw a burning tree, sometimes an eye or a clown. Counselors took notes on each painting.

Group sessions would follow, and at first they were soothing -- like girls gabbing at a sleepover. The usually shy Carole felt more comfortable with these women than she had with anyone in a long time. With the support of others, her memories became more vivid. After they recounted their stories about ritual abuse, Carole suddenly remembered that her father had gone into her bedroom at night and raped her while her mother watched -- and her brother participated as well. She broke down in sobs. The rest of the class cheered at her reconnaissance. Her therapists hailed it as a breakthrough.

In 1992, Carole confronted her family. Flanked by her counselor and a social worker, she blurted out the accusations, then fled the room. She remembers her father sitting there stoically -- not saying a word in response. Carole vowed never to speak to her parents again. Her therapy group was her new family.

But though the group held her hand and stroked her hair and told her how brave she was, Carole still was haunted.

"If all this were really true, I couldn't understand why I continued to feel so bad. When I was with the group, I was sure of the abuse, but when I was alone, I started to have doubts.

"'This is absolutely true,' I'd think. Then a second later, I'd go, 'No. I'm a liar. I'm mentally ill. None of this could possibly have happened.'"

Carole pauses from her story and grimaces at the remembrance.

"Don't torture yourself," Dawn says, trying to comfort her.

Plates still full of food have been pushed aside, and the stench of burning chicken wafts from the grill.

Carole nods, but still looks pained. "I keep thinking about my poor father," she says.

When her counselor moved away, Carole was referred to another therapist. During one of her sessions, Carole started recounting her frustrations with the art-therapy group.

"I told him that I felt things were getting out of control. My close friend in the group drew a picture of a nun, and the counselors started believing that she had been abused by the nuns as well. And she was like, 'No, no -- I drew a nun because I went to Catholic school when I was younger.'"

She told the counselor, too, about the group sessions: how when someone did not fully believe another person's story, he or she would be shunned and called out as a traitor.

"Carole," the psychiatrist said gently one day, "have you ever heard of something called false-memory syndrome?"


Becoming convinced of your own childhood abuse is not an easy thing.

"Recovered memories don't happen unless a therapist works on it and works on it. It's not like you come in one day and realize you were abused," says Richard Ofshe, a social psychologist at the University of California at Berkeley, who specializes in mind-manipulation.

But memories, by nature, are fluid and malleable, easily influenced by suggestion. People told they were abused eventually believe that they were, regardless of fact. The mind creates a visual picture of the abusive act. And if a person is surrounded by others who encourage her to draw out these pictures and details, this new memory can become even more vivid than an actual remembrance. To complicate things further, the brain starts creating emotional responses to these memories, which seem to validate the claims even more.

Ofshe is a champion of "false-memory syndrome," a notion that came about in response to the recovered-memory-therapy boom of the late '80s and early '90s. It posits that most memories of sexual abuse recovered through regressive therapy are in fact false. Recovered-memory therapists often preached that they were the only ones who could cure supposed victims -- which, of course, created its own catch-22, Ofshe says. He believes that many therapists knowingly continued the practice for their own gain. To him, the "cult of recovered memory" is "total quackery." He argues that victims of Hitler did not repress what happened to them, nor do victims of proved sexual abuse ever tend to forget that it happened.

Just as cases of recovered memory resulted in many adult children bringing suits against their parents in the early '90s, false-memory syndrome, in turn, prompted parents to bring malpractice suits against their children's therapists. These suits, as well as the huge judgments sometimes awarded, caused many therapists to abandon the recovered-memory approach altogether.

When Carole first learned about false-memory syndrome, she felt a giddy, bubbly feeling of relief mixed with guilt.

"Deep in my heart, I knew this could not be true, but this explained how I could be thinking all that stuff," she says, eyes watering. She quit therapy and reconciled with her parents. Now, she says, her best friends are her family. In clinical terms, she is a retractor.


The three families gathered around the picnic table listen with movie-theater silence to Carole's tale. None of their own children has fully retracted, though some have quietly returned to the family. In hopes of fostering reconciliation, the parents have followed therapists' advice not to discuss the accusations. So the periods of noncommunication are deemed simply the "lost years," and their lives continue to run like a videotape that suddenly went fuzzy in the middle. They hope, in the ensuing years, to figure out the details, but for now the accusations, Marilyn says, "are like the elephant in the room that no one talks about."

Marilyn, an elementary school teacher with shapely brows and an easy smile, has been listening especially closely to Carole's story. She has heard other retractors' stories before, but never one that occurred so geographically near her own. So when Carole pauses to catch her breath, Marilyn jumps in: "Did you know anyone named Heather in your therapy group?" she asks, her brown eyes as round as pennies.

She looks disappointed when Carole shakes her head no.

"Bob," she says, nudging her husband. "Maybe this is what happened to Heather. Remember when she came to the house and asked to use my painting sets? She must have gone into art therapy."

Bob nods his head thoughtfully. "Maybe. It's possible."

The Elyria family's story started as many others have: In early 1990, 33-year-old Heather was miserable about her crumbling marriage and her job, so on the advice of a friend, she sought counseling from an Akron therapist. For months afterward, Heather seemed aloof and distant, but the Joneses thought it had to do only with her current troubles.

Then one day, Bob went to the mailbox and came back white-faced, holding a handwritten note from Heather scribbled on yellow legal paper. In the letter, Heather had accused both parents of abusing her. She wrote that she was only now realizing the extent of the damage they had wrought, and she warned them not to contact her until further notice. Six months later, they met Heather in a church. There, snuggled tight between a priest and a counselor, she told her parents they should never attempt to contact her again.

"Ironically, the best thing that happened to us, as a couple, during that time is that we were both accused," says Marilyn. "I knew that I hadn't done any of the things that Heather said, so I knew there was a good chance my husband hadn't either."

Five years passed with nary a word. Then one day Heather came back.

"It was my birthday," says Marilyn, "and Heather walked into the room, and everything stopped. We were so happy to see her -- finally -- but she just stood there, the whole time with her arms folded, not really talking.

"I was like, 'Heather, you look so angry.'" Marilyn pauses.

The family agreed to attend therapy together. They went to Don Lichi in Akron, a Christian educator and counselor who had become a nationally known resource in the reintegration of families torn apart by false-memory accusations. Lichi, who has successfully counseled half a dozen families and says he's been "moderately successful" in resurrecting half a dozen more, could see that theirs was a difficult case.

("Reconciliation is not an easy thing with the families splintered by recovered-memory therapy," says Lichi. "There is reluctance on both sides. The parents are worried -- could this happen again? They're hypersensitive and vigilant. And the accusers that I see are not 100 percent convinced that the abuse did not happen, so they're wary of trying to rebuild trust.")

The Joneses were partially successful in their therapy. Heather now attends family functions, though she has never recanted. And on the advice of Lichi, Bob and Marilyn have never brought up the accusations with Heather again. For them, there remains a void -- and an unshakable anger that won't leave, no matter how hard they try to dispel it.

"We still sleep with the accusatory notes under our bed," says Bob, "just to reinforce what we had gone through. To know that all this actually happened."

"Sometimes I want to shake Heather -- say, What was going through your head at that point? How could you do this to us?" adds Marilyn. "But I can't, because I'm just so happy to have her back." (Heather could not be reached for this story.)

Sticking a fork into a piece of cake, Dawn Patterson nods her head vigilantly. "My friends are still so mad at my daughter. One told me that she just wants to smack her whenever she sees her. But they don't understand that she was brainwashed. She was a really loving child. She'd never have done this if she hadn't been brainwashed."


Five years ago, after three years of self-imposed isolation, Megan showed up on the Pattersons' doorstep. Michael had been hospitalized for a heart procedure, and Megan said that she did not want her father to die without seeing him again. He has since recovered, and Megan now takes part in family activities and holidays, but an intimacy is missing from their relationship that is present with their other kids. Megan has never recanted her accusations -- which started when she first went to a therapist at Ohio State University in the late 1980s.

The Pattersons' story follows a familiar outline: Megan sent a letter accusing them of abuse, cut off all contact, and refused to talk to those who disagreed with her. But her parents, frustrated by the lack of contact, hired a private investigator to track her: The investigator reported that Megan was living in Columbus, and he found the name of the therapist she was seeing. Convinced that the therapist was the reason for Megan's epiphanies, the Pattersons hired another investigator, around the same age as Megan, to pose with the same sort of depressive symptoms their daughter had displayed. They sent the investigator into the sessions wired, and she came back with tapes.

In one instance, the investigator admitted that she "didn't have any memories of abuse," to which the therapist responded, "Most of the time that people have that particular collection of experiences, responses, and reactions, it's about some form of abuse."

The Pattersons sobbed while transcribing the rest of the tapes. It gave them a sense of vindication, but grievances remain. The Pattersons' home includes a room overflowing with accusatory letters from Megan, undercover tapes, and bills from the investigators.

If today their relationship is mended, the stitched-up seams can easily be seen.

"My daughter and I decided to not talk about it," says Dawn. "It causes so much friction. We've just built on our relationship, and it's worked. We're pretty much back to normal, though I honestly, truly do not know how she feels. I pray daily that she will recant, like Carole, and I hope she does so before her dad dies."

"She's our daughter. Of course we forgive her," says Bob. Nonetheless, they have cut back her inheritance.


She's my daughter. For a long time, Nate James thought such reasoning was total bullshit.

"Everyone else in our group just wanted their children to come back," says Nate, who has known the Pattersons for 10 years. "But I wanted more than that. I wanted an apology. My daughters accused me of something unforgivable, and I wanted my name back. It was a good name, and I wanted it back again." He sighs, and his cheeks flush red. The story, no matter how many times he tells it, always gets him agitated.

But Nate is much older now, with strands of yellowish blond hair that he carefully combs to one side. He buried his wife a little over a year ago and for the first time truly understands the meaning of loneliness -- though he had plenty of time to contemplate it before.

On May 3, 1993, police surprised Nate at his Fairview Park home. They wanted to discuss his elder daughter, who told cops he had molested her.

"My mouth dropped," he says.

Charges against Nate were eventually dropped; his daughter, it turned out, had accused no fewer than 26 others of molestation too.

"Your daughter sure must have been busy having all that sex. It's a wonder she had time to go to us at all," he remembers one cop telling him.

But though his daughter did not persuade the cops of her case, she did convince her younger sister to seek therapy too. Afterward, both of them dropped out of their parents' lives. (Neither daughter could be reached for this story.)

In the absence of his daughters, Nate's fury filled the empty space. But over the past decade, the anger has gradually subsided, like a battery slowly running out of energy.

And when his wife became sick a few years ago, the younger daughter came back in tears.

"It was a big love fest," says Nate. "But at the same time, no one was saying to me, 'Gee, Dad, I'm sorry I said those things."

His elder daughter still has not returned.


Carole listens carefully to Nate's story. She folds her fingers together as if in prayer, and her feet, clad in soft leather shoes, are crossed at the ankles. She says that she is still grieving -- her own dad died less than three months ago.

"My father," she says softly, "was not like the rest of you. He didn't want to talk about the accusations. All I wanted to do all day, every day, was apologize, and he just kept saying, 'Stop, stop, I don't want to discuss this."

"He was so loving, so wonderful. I would do anything to take it back."

When a tear starts to form at the edge of her eye, Marilyn jumps in: "Lots of people don't even get to apologize. Think about that, Carole."

Carole pauses. "Still, I can't even imagine how much I hurt him. When he was dying and started having these hallucinations, and they wanted to keep him in the hospital but he wanted to go home, my dad looked at me and said, 'Carole, are you doing this to me because you still believe I did that stuff to you when you were little?"

She sighs. The table falls silent.

"When I was moving this year, my husband and I were unpacking all these boxes in our new home, and I saw the book The Courage to Heal. We had been getting rid of lots of books by giving them to Goodwill. This one, I said, we have to throw away."

Names of parents and children in this story have been changed to protect their identities.

From clevescene.com
Originally published by Cleveland Scene Aug 04, 2004

 

 

 

 

Discover
 August 2004 pp 73 - 77

Are Recovered Memories Real
by Jill Neimark
           
                      
A growing body of evidence indicates that memory is deeply unreliable and that life-shattering events cannot be buried for years and then winched out
of the deep waters of the subconscious

You are lying naked on a metal table, your legs strapped into restraints.       You can see luminescent alien beings with big, froglike eyes as they move about in the darkness. They begin to cut into your body, and you are afraid they might cut out your heart.                                                                        .
 
That description comes from a study of people who claim to be alien abductees, which was conducted at Harvard University and published in the journal Psychological Science this summer. The transcript was distilled from a recorded interview with an "abductee" and was then played back to him while researchers measured signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Listening to his own story triggered physiological responses as pronounced as those seen in combat veterans. Similar physiological responses were measured in nine other abductees in the study.
 

The halls of Harvard, nestled amid the 19th-century clapboard houses and cobbled streets of Cambridge, seem an unlikely place to take extraterrestrials seriously. But the study is part of a six-year probe by Harvard psychologist Richard McNally and his colleagues into the minds of apparently sane people who believe they have memories of long-repressed events, including sexual abuse, alien abduction, and past lives. The study is an attempt to learn if humans can create memories unwittingly, memories so strong they may cause the debilitating symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

McNally thinks people can and do make up powerful memories. And these false memories can take on a life of their own, with profound legal, political, and social consequences. If juries find plaintiffs' recovered memories credible, people go to jail. About a decade ago, a wave of cases involving recovered memories of sexual abuse tore families apart, led to lurid court trials, and spawned a branch of therapy devoted to recovered memories. Today another wave of trials are under way involving allegations of sexual abuse of children by priests. More than 500 cases of sexual abuse are pending in the Boston archdiocese alone. McNally says many of these cases involve "supposedly recovered memory."

His research suggests that all memories--even false ones--are not just accessories of experience. Memory _is_ experience, McNally says, a neurohormonal event that cascades through the brain and, when accompanied by powerful emotions, is burned into synapses. And he wonders how and why the human brain does this.

There are no definitive answers yet, but there are powerful clues. With the help of sophisticated neuroimaging techniques, researchers are finding that memory's malleability is yoked to some of our most cherished aspects of intelligence: imagination, inference, and prediction. These are the same capacities that make us Earth's dominant species. And because of this, it's likely that memory's vulnerability to error is here to stay.

               
 * * *

At the turn of the last century, Freud invoked the concept of repression, a protective mental mode that smothers distressing emotional events. Scientists have been sparring over the nature of memory ever since, and in the last few decades the fight has become so acrimonious that psychologist Kathy Pezdek of Claremont Graduate University in California, likens it to a religious war. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist at the University of California at Irvine, whose studies of false memory have made her the target of a lawsuit and a separate investigation by her former university, says her "life has been derailed" by her search. McNally echoes her: "I've had to consult Harvard's general counsel on three different occasions because of the saber rattling of trauma experts who didn't like my work." Susan Clancy, a psychologist who trained under McNally says: "When I started this research, hate mail poured in by the ton. One colleague told me to get out of the area entirely since I'd be ruling myself out of job opportunities."

Researchers are at war because there is no definitive evidence that life-shattering events can actually be buried for years, as Freud suggested, then winched out of the deep waters of the subconscious like a long-lost corpse. Yet people who claim to have done exactly that are tremendously convincing. Their sensory details are often striking and terrifying in their clarity. And these memories are intense enough to forever alter lives. "This experience [of abduction] really hits you in the pants," says Will Beuche, an abductee who participated in McNally's study. "All your assumptions about life are broken. It feels like every thing you had based your character development on was wrong. You feel washed up on the shore with no personality at all."

Such certainty is strong enough to convince another Harvard psychiatrist that the experiences, if not the abductions themselves, are real. John Mack, who heads the John E. Mack Institute a few minutes' walk from McNally's office, speaks of the "ontological shock" he went through when he first listened to the stories of abductees. Mack is the author of Abduction: Human Encounters With Aliens and Passport to the Cosmos: Human Transformation and Alien Encounters." That data operated like sulfuric acid on my worldview," he says in a film documentary. "I couldn't account for this in any way with anything I had
learned"

In 1999 McNally and Susan Clancy, then a graduate student, published the first of a series of landmark studies that tried to account for such memories in a way that Mack could not. It has not been easy for psychologists to design respectable, ethical, replicable laboratory studies on recovered memory that their peers will accept. Critics shrug off most research with the comment that lab studies say nothing about repression of real-life trauma. Since the 1970s,for instance, Loftus has been able to implant false memories in individuals in lab studies -- that they were lost in a mall as children or that they hugged Bugs Bunny at Disneyland (where there is no Bugs Bunny, because he's a not a Disney character). She has also shown that implanted memories can influence behavior. In one study Loftus and her colleagues successfully led people to believe that they once got sick eating either hard-boiled eggs or dill pickles. Yet creating relatively innocuous memories in normal, healthy people may not relate to the experience of trauma victims.

So Clancy, McNally, and a Harvard colleague, psychologist Daniel Schacter, decided to initiate a study of women who claimed to have recovered memories of sexual abuse. These women were at the white-hot center of the memory wars, and yet, says Clancy, "nobody was doing laboratory research on memory formation in this population. We wanted to know whether they were prone to creating false memories." One of their studies tested four groups of women: those who'd been sexually abused and always remembered, those who believed they had been sexually abused but had no memory of it, those who had recovered memories of sexual abuse, and a control group who were certain they had never been abused. Each subject was given a standard word-retrieval test, in which she was presented with a list of semantically related words ("rest, dream, nap, tired"). Each was then presented with the list again, but this time a new word appeared on the list (such as "sleep") similar in meaning to others on the original list.

Those with recovered memories of abuse recalled having seen the missing word on the first list 68 percent of the time, compared with only 38 percent for controls. The recovered-memory group scored significantly higher than any of the other three on false remembering. "There's a heightened tendency for false-memory formation in those who can recall and visualize recovered memories," McNally says.

Trauma therapists were outraged by the study. One of their objections: Perhaps the trauma had been so horrific it was not only banished from memory for years but also created memory defects that were now showing up in lab tests. So McNally and Clancy recruited individuals with recovered memories of alien abduction for the next study. Seven out of 11 of the abductees in their experiment had reported (under hypnosis) that they had their sperm or eggs extracted by aliens for breeding purposes. McNally and Clancy figured that nobody could argue that this group of subjects had post-traumatic stress disorder based on actual abuse during alien abductions that impaired their ability to remember events accurately in the lab. "We thought we'd found the perfect study group -- people who clearly had created vivid, traumatic, false memories," says Clancy.

The group produced significantly more false memories on the same word-retrieval test, just as the women with recovered memories of sexual abuse had. But that study also drew ire -- from both abductees as well as the general population." That totally shocked me," says Clancy. "I got more hate mail, even from very educated people. I'd get letters asking me who I was to say these people hadn't been abducted."

The results of their latest study are even more intriguing. McNally, Clancy, and others at Harvard studied physiological stress in 10 abductees and 12 controls. Individuals were interviewed about traumatic, neutral, and pleasant experiences. Thirty-second scripts were distilled from the interviews and then recorded by Scott Orr, who runs a psychophysiology lab at the Manchester VA medical Center in New Hampshire. Abductees listened to the recordings while hooked up to electrodes that monitor sweat, heart rate, and muscle tension. This method, using script-driven imagery, has been used many times to measure post-traumatic stress disorder in war veterans. The abductees had a significantly heightened stress response. Even McNally was surprised. "Their reactivity was a great as real post-traumatic stress patients. These people genuinely believe these events happened, and it's reflected in their physiology."

McNally thinks that one reason abductees, who are on all other measures sane and healthy individuals, are more vulnerable to false memories, is a trait called absorption: "They score higher on measures of fantasy and absorption, which is the ability, for instance, to get lost in daydreams or be utterly entranced by a sunset. Their response to script-driven imagery about pleasurable moments in their lives is also higher than normal. So the upshot is, I think this stress response is a marker for intense emotional memories in people with vivid imaging capacities."

Could our cherished capacity to imagine, which gives life and art richness, be key to false memory?

                
 * * *

People tend to view imagination as a purely mental activity but it is strongly linked to vision. The work of Stephen Kosslyn, a Harvard psychologist, explains why.

Four floors down from McNally's office at Harvard's William James Hall are Kosslyn's spacious quarters. Precariously piled journals cover an oversize wooden desk, along with a plastic replica of a brain, which Kosslyn gladly takes apart for a visitor, pointing out the visual centers at the very back. Those centers are the focus of his studies.

Kosslyn began conducting neuroimaging studies of the brain (PET and fMRI) in1990 made a surprising discovery: Every area of the brain that is activated when we see is also activated when we crate an image in our mind. "It was absolutely amazing," he says. "The primary visual cortex, the first visual area of the brain that registers input from the eyes, is even activated by imagery with the eyes closed. That suggests the opportunity for distortion is huge. The upside is, if imagery simulates what you actually see in the brain, you can use it for memory or reasoning or predicting. The downside is that you can become confused about the source of images. That's kind of scary."

One study of eight easily hypnotized individuals found that when they were simply asked to perceive a color, color areas in the brain were activated --even if they were looking at a gray scale. The control group did not show this effect. Another study found that vivid visualization accompanied by emotion triggered more activation in visual processing systems than images alone did.

The human capacity for imagination is so great that some times people can create delayed post-traumatic stress disorder even in the absence of remembered traumas. Psychologist Richard Bryant of the University of New South Wales in Australia studied individuals who had been in such a serious accident that they'd been knocked unconscious and had no memory of the event. A few of them later developed full-scale post-traumatic stress disorder. When Bryant interviewed them, he found they had reconstructed the accident by looking at news reports, photographs, and listening to the accounts of friends. In an act of pure imagination, they had cobbled together an accurate account that was so vividly pictured and felt that it was powerful enough to produce post-traumatic stress disorder.

Laboratory studies suggest that the brain has unique sensitivity to images. Psychologist Stephen Lindsay of the University of Victoria in British Columbia published a study in Psychological Science in March that demonstrates how pictures enhance the formation of false memories. He showed 45 students a scenario purporting to describe an event in their first-grade class. The false story told how an individual and a friend got into trouble for putting Slime, a goo-like substance, in their teacher's desk. When Lindsay added a class photo from the first grade to the scenario, he found that two out of three students believed the false event happened. Lindsay was astonished at the high rate of false-memory reports: "and the false memories were richly detailed. One student commented, 'No way! I remembered it! That is so weird!'"

"We tell ourselves stories in order to live," wrote Joan Didion in The White Album. Perhaps it's not so baffling that what we can't recall, we invent. Memory is designed to filter the world and discard what is deemed irrelevant, says psychologist Marcia Johnson of Yale University. That we tend to home in on the details of an event is called weapon focus -- we can recall with grisly clarity the gun that as pointed at us by a robber, but we may not remember his face or the other people in the store. If our brains were perfect video cameras, we'd be paralyzed by information overload. In the short story "Funes, the Memorious,"Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges imagines just such a savant and writes, "in the overly replete world of Funes there were nothing but details."

There is at least one real-life Funes, and behavioral neuroscientist James McGaugh, at the University of California at Irvine is studying her: "This woman came to me and said, 'My memory is too good.' For her, it's like looking at a Rolodex and seeing all the names at the same time. It's a flood of information, and it can make her life difficult."

People _never_ capture anything literally, says psychologist Henry L. Roediger III of Washington University in St. Louis. "Whenever you encode an experience, you filter through your own awareness. If we only remembered the literal words of a conversation, we might miss the meaning. If I tell you I'm really tired today because the baby was up all night, you might remember that the baby cried all night. It's an inference. We're always doing that, and that's actually very intelligent" The odd thing, though, is that we usually don't know we're confabulating. People have an unfounded confidence in their memories, says Elizabeth Loftus. She notes that in one recent study she worked on, three-quarters of the subjects reported having excellent memories. When college students were asked about the Challenger explosion years after tinctured, every single one remembered the spaceship blowing up, but many got the details wrong. Thus, notes Marcia Johnson, when the brain strives to re-create an event, it often graft details of other memories onto it.

"The common wisdom was that once an experience was consolidated in long-term memory, it was stable," says neurobiologist Yadin Dudai of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. "Some of us now think that a memory may returnto its embryonic state when it's activated." In the lab, experiments point in both directions. Joseph Leduc, the Henry and Lucy Moses Professor of Science at New York University, was able to block the process of encoding a conditioned fear response in rats by injecting a drug, neomycin, into their brains. The drug inhibits the synthesis of proteins and thus blocks the formation, or consolidation, of a memory, Twenty-four hours later, the rats' consolidation fear response seemed to disappear. Yet a study recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that the memory was only temporarily blocked. This time University of Pennsylvania researchers conditioned rodents, treated them with anisomycin, and then examined them 21days later. They remembered the conditioned behavior.

Just to confuse the issue further, research that has just been published finds that in rats conditioned to fear a shock to the foot, memory formation and subsequent recall, or consolidation, are actually separate processes, and thus established memories may be malleable and sensitive to disruption. Although both an original memory and its retrieval / reconsolidation may be blocked temporarily by anisomycin. University of Cambridge psychologist Barry Everitt and his colleagues found that the two processes depend on different chemicals within the hippocampus. The initial formation of long-term memory requires a chemical called brain-derived neurotrophic factor, while subsequent recall depends on a transcription factor called Zif268. The processes are related but fundamentally different -- and so the researches conclude that repeated remembering does not create a duplicate of the original memory. If we can isolate the chemicals involved in how memories are recalled, we may someday have new drugs to help treat phobias, post-traumatic stress disorder, and intrusive memories.

                         
      * * *

In real life, McNally says, memories do change. Yale University psychiatrist Steven Southwick surveyed Gulf War veterans first one month, then two years after traumatic events. About half the veterans who checked off events on the first survey failed to check off some of the same events after two years had passed. The timbre and quality of memories changes over time too. McNally gave a questionnaire to personnel 6 months after a fatal shooting at a grammar school in suburban Chicago. The same questionnaire was given again 18 months after the shooting. "Each person remembered the event differently at 18 months than at 6months," says McNally. At the second interview, those who had more severe symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder recalled the events as more harrowing, while memories were recalled as less harrowing by those who had recovered.

We create our memories even as they create us -- a Mobius strip, an Escher ring, a double helix, if you will, from which the blueprint of self emerges. It's both dazzling and chilling to realize that the narrative arc of our lives relies on a phenomenon that is by turns robust, fallible, malleable, potent, slippery, inventive, and above all, powerfully yoked to emotion.

If we are storytellers, even inaccurate ones, how does that serve us? "What has been missing from all the theories of false memory," says Clancy, "is the desire for meaning. I think psychologists are tone deaf to this. It's a very important ideological factor in the development of any belief. Alien abductees talk about the fact that they don't feel alone in the universe any longer." When McNally and Clancy asked abductees if they were glad they'd had these experiences, "we only had one person say no. Everyone else said it was initially disorienting and frightening but that they eventually put it all in a spiritual perspective."

So how and why would an individual develop a story line as unusual as abduction? Are there any common ingredients? Part of the answer may derive from a physiologically dramatic and terrifying phenomenon called sleep paralysis. In classic sleep paralysis, a person wakes early from a dream and is unable to move as is standard during REM sleep). In many of these cases people also generate vivid dream images called hypnopompic hallucinations. Many alien abductees experience sleep paralysis, and if they don't understand the phenomenon and believe their otherworldly hallucinations are real, says McNally, they may seek out therapy, hypnosis, or bodywork, thereby "recovering" additional memories." These folks are very open to what we might call New Age beliefs. such as reincarnation, energy therapies, astrology, reincarnation, and telepathy."

Will Beuche sees it this way: "I won't call abduction a spiritual experience, but by its very nature it casts you into reflection about your existence . . .you feel you're behind the scenes of a theater, of an incredible play . . . this play we're all in."

But he might as well be talking about the phenomenon of memory itself -- in which we somehow weave and unweave ourselves by our own hand.

                             
   
S I D E B A R

Putting Freud to the Test:
Can Memories be Repressed?

Freud's theory of repression has intrigued psychologists since the 1930s, but nobody has proved it exists. Cognitive neuroscientist Michael Anderson, who runs a memory lab at the University of Oregon, believes he's got the goods. "You don't have to subscribe to highly specialized mechanisms like the ones Freud might have proposed," says Anderson. "You can explain it with very well-respected ideas in neuroscience and psychology." For instance, he says, we all exercise what is known as executive control. We can focus our attention on one thing and ignore distractions. Scientists have shown a sequence of letters to individuals and told them that each time they see a letter, they should press a key -- except when the letter X appears. "These are called go/no-go procedures," says Anderson. "They're set up so the individual gets into a rhythm of seeing letters and pressing the key, and when X appears, they have to stop themselves." Monkey studies have shown that the no-go response is associated with specific regions of the frontal cortex.

To test a similar paradigm in memory, Anderson created a think/no-think procedure for recalling word pairs. In a study they found that the subjects, when prompted, could push the second word in a learned word pair out of awareness, which made it harder to recall later. Recently, Anderson and his colleagues used the same think/no-think procedure along with fMRI. In a study published in Science in January 2004, they found that suppressing recollection reduced the activity of the hippocampus, the same organ that shuttles short-term memories into long-term storage. They also found greater activity in many areas of the prefrontal cortex. The same areas that are active in go/no-go procedures
Daniel Schacter, a Harvard university psychologist, warns that Anderson's results do not address the issue of whether _traumatic_ memories can be repressed. He says that Anderson's work uses Freud's first definition of repression -- an _intentional_ attempt to banish distressing experiences form conscious awareness. Freud later used the term to refer to a defense mechanism that operated beyond a person's awareness. That model of repression has never been proved to exist.

Psychologist Henry L. Roediger III of Washington University in St. Louis says he has failed to replicate Anderson's work. Anderson responds that Roediger was using a slightly different and earlier design and that the results have been replicated elsewhere. Roediger says: "If repression hinges on this teeny-weeny change, then it is not very robust. I'm not saying the effect can't be obtained-- I'm just saying it's hard to obtain."

"I don't subscribe to the view that repression needs to be unconscious,
complete, or permanent," says Anderson. "It can be a process that requires effort over time and may lead people to forget all or part of an unwanted experience. Even if somebody doesn't forget the Holocaust, for instance, they may forget details over time. This may actually help. We need to find out how people cope with distressing memories. That's why this is a pretty damned important topic to research." -J.N.

 

 

 

 

    

Hit Counter