O  A  R  M  H  P

OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RESPONSIBLE MENTAL HEALTH PRACTICES

June 2002

Father’s Day Greetings 


Hi everyone,

We have had a wet spring, which means the flowers aren't planted, but everything is nice and green. We are featuring Paula Tyroler this month, another friend from Canada. Even though she and her husband are still grieving, she is a tireless worker for the FMS cause. She helps with workshops, writes articles, and is on the FMS board, to name a few jobs she has performed. 

Carole


Please Don’t Betray My Daughter.

Paula M. Tyroler

On a warm September evening in 1991 my husband, our daughter, a family friend and I were standing on a busy street in downtown Toronto. We had come for a short visit from our small Northern Ontario town and had just finished dinner at Movenpick. All evening, the atmosphere had been tense. My daughter did not talk to me and she kept throwing hate-filled glances at her father.

We were worried. For some time, we had been aware that she was seeing a psychotherapist, and we had noticed a profound, negative change in her behaviour toward us. We wanted to talk, to ask questions, but the presence of our friend prevented that. We were hoping for a private opportunity later in the evening, but after a few awkward moments, my daughter shake hands with the family friend and without a word to us, she turned and walked away.

This rather uneventful evening will be etched in my memory for the years to come, since it will be forever associated with the disappearance of my daughter from my life. No, she did not die the next day I n a car crash. She was hit by a fast-moving out-of-control train driven by the most pernicious fad of the last decade. It came to be known as “recovered memory therapy”. She was snatched from us, without much warning, by a therapy cult.

Shortly after our Toronto visit my daughter indicated that she did not want to see us any more. For a while, we maintained sporadic contact through phone calls, which were always initiated by her father or by me. Five years ago, she cut even this thin thread.

Back in 1991, it took several months before we uncovered the roots of her irrational hostility. Finally, she had revealed that through the guidance of her therapist, she had recovered memories of the most horrendous sexual abuse that her father supposedly perpetrated upon her for many years, while I looked the other way. She admitted that she had been completely unaware of this abuse until after an extensive “memory work” with her therapist.

We were horrified. We could only think that she had fallen prey to a mentally ill doctor. We could not imagine that a person of a sound mind would, without question, accept that father would rape his three-year-old daughter with her mother’s tacit approval, and that this criminal activity could go on for years without being remembered by the child or noticed by the rest of the family, by babysitters, teachers or the family doctor. We concluded that this doctor had to be a delusional pervert who was imposing his sick fantasies upon our vulnerable daughter at a time when she was very distressed.

At first we thought that we were the only people in the world hit by the fallout from this obscene manipulation masquerading as therapy. But after our story was published in the Toronto Star in May 1992, we were flooded with phone calls and letters from people in similar situation. It was a great but sad relief to find that we were not alone in this terrible predicament. We came to understand that there were therapists who were using memory retrieval techniques on patients with a variety of problems ranging all the way from anorexia to zoophobia.

We started reading, speaking to professionals and networking with other affected families. We desperately wanted to understand what had happened to our daughter and what could be done in to return her life to normal. Gradually, we learned more about memory retrieval therapy. This fad, which started in the mid-to-late 80’s, was based on an unsubstantiated belief that the human mind has the capacity to completely banish memories of extremely traumatic events of a sexual nature, and then to recover these memories in more or less pristine form years or even decades later. Although this concept flies in the face of common human experience—and anyone with common sense must shake his or her head in disbelief at this nonsense—the notion of “repression” and “recovery” of traumatic memories of sexual abuse spread like a bush fire in relatively small but powerful, ideologically motivated subculture of mental health care providers.

After two years, my daughter left her original therapist and in time ended up with a female psychiatrist, a member of the Canadian Psychiatric Association. This woman not only uncritically accepted my daughter’s absurd “memories”, she actually helped her “recover” more of them. In order to facilitate the recovery of memories of being abused by her grandfather, my daughter started visiting her grandfather’s grave. Gradually, her irrational hatred spread to other family members, including her dying grandmother, whom she refused to see, although she loved her dearly in the pre-therapy years. In the interim, she lost her job, broke up with her spouse, and started moving from shelter to shelter, living off government handouts. Her newly-found “memories” became the center of her universe. Her family and her pre-therapy friends had been replaced by people who lent support to her delusional beliefs.

Although my daughter is the primary victim of this tragic fad, my life has also been profoundly affected. Before the therapist filled her with bottomless hatred and paranoid fear, my daughter and I were best of friend, sharing many interests. We both enjoyed hiking, and spent countless hours walking and talking. We always looked forward to our traditional hike in Killarney Park on the Thanksgiving weekend. We shared the same taste in books and movies. I miss her and I worry about her. The passage of time has not diminished my grief. There is no closure, just everlasting apprehension. I know that she was hospitalized at one point because she was suicidal and I fear for her life.

When I wake up in the morning or in the middle of the night, my first thoughts are of her. What does she do? Is she safe? Is she healthy? How does she cope? Then I think about her psychiatrist, a woman I’ve never met. I try to understand her motivation, her way of thinking. She is a true puzzle to me. Is she a caring human being who has caused harm unintentionally and ho now realizes her mistake but does not know how to make it right? Does she wake up in a cold sweat, overwhelmed by doubt and remorse? Or is she callously indifferent to the therapy-induced suffering of her patient? How can she, an educated intelligent woman believe in this “repressed-and-recovered memory” nonsense? And how can she, a professional with mostly female clientele, believe for a moment that an emotionally stable and financially independent mother—or any mother for that matter—would allow her husband to rape her daughter repeatedly from the age of three, and do nothing about it? What kind of perverted perception does this female psychiatrist have about women?

I have spent the last ten years as an activist, a role I never dreamed of in the pre-accusation days. I work hard at exposing the harm caused by the recovered memory movement and I strive for mental health care reform. Love for my daughter is my driving force. If this situation were not so sad, I would be very fulfilled by what I am doing. In the past several years I have helped many people, and I have learned profound lessons about human nature. I’ve met wonderful people among the accused and their families, and I have become friends with some of the brightest professionals in the fields of psychology, psychiatry and the law. I was touched by their deep commitment to justice and by their social responsibility. These people voiced their critique of the recovered memory movement early on and opened themselves to vulgar attacks and intimidation. They have my admiration and respect.

I’ve also had my share of disappointments. When this all started in 1991, I thought that professional organizations and licensing boards—the very institutions which are suppose to protect the public from quackery—would act swiftly and decisively. Ten years later, I am still waiting.


The Science and Politics of Recovered Memory

Commentary to the Special Issue of Ethics and Behavior: The Science and Politics of Recovered Memory, Volume 8, Number 2, 1998 By: Paula M. Tyroler Laurentian University. Sudbury, Ontario

 

A young woman close to my heart, let's call her Claire, was a vivacious person who loved her parents and was eager to contribute to society in her chosen field. Recovered memory therapy robbed her of her professional career, of her family support system and of her mental health. It turned her into an unemployed recipient of government handouts, who is alienated from her family and all pre-therapy friends.

It all started in 1991, when Claire entered therapy for mild depression. Her therapist was a doctor of medicine and a former professor at the University of Toronto. Under his guidance, Claire "recovered memories" of abuse of which she was completely unaware before the therapy started. She "uncovered" that she was molested by her father from the age of two, vaginally raped at the age of three and raped, sodomized and engaged in oral sex for many years. She presumably "repressed" all "memories" of these crimes. Her mother supposedly knew about her father's criminal behavior and turned the other way. No one else noticed what was allegedly happening in their house, not her sister, not the teachers, not the family doctor.

Although her therapist admitted in his letter to her parents, "the interpretation of her memories could be erroneous," he never bothered to convey this opinion to Claire and he passed her on to another doctor whom Claire described as "an incest specialist.” Without the slightest attempt to secure external corroboration, this psychiatrist told her that her parents were "perpetrators in denial.”

Eventually, Claire ended up with yet another psychiatrist, a female who advertises her services as a specialist in women's issues. This doctor has been treating Claire for five years for post-traumatic stress disorder, the trauma being the alleged but never verified horrible sexual abuse at the hands of her father. She, too, categorically refused any input from her patient's parents and from several concerned professionals. While in her care, Claire became so depressed and suicidal that she had to be hospitalized.

In the "Editor's Note" to the Special Issue of Ethics and Behavior: The Science and Politics of Recovered Memory, Dr. Koocher complains: " . . . skilled, thoughtful, well-trained clinicians

Are too often tarred with the brush that should be reserved for the quacks of psychotherapy . . . "

I have a great difficulty in deciding which one of these two categories describes Claire's therapists. According to Webster's Dictionary, a quack is "an untrained person who practices medicine fraudulently.” All three therapists involved in Claire's treatment are doctors of medicine, licensed by the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons. Hence, one would certainly assume that they are "skilled" and "well-trained.” And yet, they have inflicted a horrendous, irreparable harm on their patient and her family. Can they be "well-trained" and "quacks" at the same time?

Let's look at another definition of the word quack, when used as an adjective. According to Webster, "quack" means "characterized by pretentious claims with little or no foundation.” And this is precisely what recovered memory therapy is all about: it is a treatment that pretends to be well founded but is built on a quicksand of pseudoscience. It is a treatment that profoundly violates accepted standards of care in psychiatry, regardless of whether it is administered by well-trained doctors of medicine or by dilatants with very little formal training.

On several occasions, members and activities of the False Memory

Syndrome Foundation are denigrated in articles published in this special issue. But the FMSF, an organization of concerned professionals and parents would not have been needed if professional licensing boards had not failed the public they were supposed to protect.

Claire's sad fate is by no means unique. In the past seven years, I have met hundreds of families who lost their adult children to this unprecedented quackery tolerated by professional organizations.

Although the severity of therapy-induced damage inflicted upon their children differs from case to case, the common pattern is undeniable.

I also met quite a few retractors. Their testimonies, ignored or

Downplayed by "recovered memory" proponents, provide us with frightening glimpses of what goes on behind the closed doors of the offices of "recovered memory" practitioners, glimpses that reveal a dangerous combination of overt or "disguised" hypnosis, and high dosages of mind-altering drugs. For a definition of "disguised" hypnosis see Perry, 1995.

The authors who are gathered on the pages of this special issue of Ethics and Behavior to defend the movement that damaged mental health of untold therapy victims, belong to a rapidly shrinking population: supporters of the "repressed-and-recovered memory" concept. They prop up their erroneous beliefs by presenting "35 documented cases in which recovered memories of traumatic childhood events were corroborated by clear and convincing evidence."

I am familiar with one of the cases, and it is far from being based on "clear and convincing evidence.” It is based on the false confession of a dying old man who could not face the stress of a trial. But what is more important,memory-retrieval therapy in its present, insidious form, has been practiced by a relatively large number of therapists for at least ten years. Hence, there are probably hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people who "recovered" previously supposedly inaccessible "memories" of childhood sexual abuse.

I believe that both sides are in agreement on these estimates. For example, Bass and Davis (1994) estimate the number of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse in this country to be about 50 million. If only 10% were "recovered memory" cases, this amounts to 5 million people with "recovered memories" of abuse. Pendergrast (1997) bases his estimate on published surveys of therapists' practices and beliefs and concludes that "it is reasonable to assume that since the hunt for repressed memories came to full flower in 1988, several million have come to believe that they are 'Survivors'".

If childhood sexual abuse by trusted family members and its subsequent "repression" are so common, one would certainly expect more than 35 presumably corroborated cases. Where are the rest? First of all, recovered memory.


 

REMEMBER the National FMS Conference is October 5-6, 2002 in Glenview, IL (Chicago.)

 

Sponsored by

FMS Foundation and the Illinois-Wisconsin Society.

Paul McHugh and Elizabeth Loftus will be speaking.

Hope to see you there

 


O  A  R  M  H  P

OHIO ASSOCIATION OF RESPONSIBLE MENTAL HEALTH PRACTICES

 

440-356-4544

 

cdk77@webtv.net

WWW.LTECH.NET/OHIOARMHP